Drive By #$%^ing—er, Tweeting.

Published On: 2017-07-26By:

Note: This post may contain some vulgarities, but no obscenity, at least as defined by the Supreme Court in Miller v. California (1973)

So, my morning started of early, with a lovely bike ride. It was nice in cool in Southern California, so I had a lovely 20 miles. Then, I took my phone out of my pocket and was confronted with two really shitty posts. The first was on twitter, and the second was so shallow that it may as well been a tweet.

I love Twitter, I’ve been on for almost ten years, and as a data nerd, and sports fan, it is like the end all be all of services. However, for discourse, 140 characters leaves out the ability to for any nuance or subtlety. (See the President of United States, not that he had any nuance or subtlety to begin with). However, when you legitimately want to critique something, prose works far better than a 140 characters.

The First #$%, er Tweeter

So I got back from my ride, and the first thing I saw was:

Screen Shot 2017-07-26 at 8.09.53 AM

Richie, that tweet was school on Sunday dude. Not cool—I get that you may not like the sessions picked, or general direction of the organization (I certainly disagree with a ton of what PASS does, and am moderately vocal about it). But when you write a tweet like that, you are basically inferring that a bunch of shitty speakers, submitted a a bunch of shitty sessions, and the program committee organized a total shit show. You probably didn’t mean that—I personally think the new emphasis on development isn’t the right approach for a database conference. However, that’s a) not my decision, and b) a more nuanced thought than “Summit sucks, haha.”

The old saying about “if you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything”, is wrong. However, if you don’t have anything constructive to say,don’t insult 150+ speakers,volunteers, and potential sponsors who might be reading your stream.

The Second #$%e, Blogger

I’m not linking to this guy’s shit. Because it’s shit.

Screen Shot 2017-07-26 at 9.11.10 AM

Here’s the gist of this post—Azure SQL Database and Azure Blob Storage are completely $%^&ing insecure because they have public IP addresses. Never mind, that you can completely lock them down to all IP addresses, and Azure. (Granted a database or storage account that no one can access is probably of limited value). However, these services are fully accessed controlled and have built-in security. Additionally, in the case of SQL DB, you have the option of built-in threat detection that will detect anomalous behavior like SQL injection, or rogue logins.

Currently, Azure doesn’t have the ability the put your database on a VNet. I’d be shocked if the Azure team is not working on said feature. In the article, the author makes a point of Amazon having the ability to do this for RDS. That’s cool, and probably why Microsoft is working on it. But instead of focusing on how to secure your app in a hybrid platform, he just shits on the vendor with a clickbait headline.

Wheaton’s Law

Wheaton’s Law, which also happens to be the core of our HR policy at DCAC, is simply “Don’t be a dick”. Think before you write and tweet—don’t write clickbait crap, and if you want to criticize an org, do it carefully, and write a blog post. Or send someone a DM.



Contact the Author | Contact DCAC

Video

Globally Recognized Expertise

As Microsoft MVP’s and Partners as well as VMware experts, we are summoned by companies all over the world to fine-tune and problem-solve the most difficult architecture, infrastructure and network challenges.

And sometimes we’re asked to share what we did, at events like Microsoft’s PASS Summit 2015.

Awards & Certifications

Microsoft Partner       Insights Sccess Award    Technology Headlines Award    Golden Bridge Gold Award    CIO Review Top 20 Azure Solutions Providers    VMWare Partner
Microsoft Certified Master    Microsoft MVP
Share via