Myself and many other people have been saying for quite a while now that you need to align your disks before putting data on them. I know have some information on how you can figure out just how much potential performance you are loosing by not aligning.
Before we can begin to figure this out we need to know what the average work load for the disk is going to be. In the SQL Server world this is easy. SQL Server does everything in 8k pages within 64k extents. Each time it needs to read from the disk it reads the 64k extent from the disk and each time it writes to the disk it writes the 64k extent. So our data size is 64k.
We take this number and divide by 64. So in our case 64/64 = 1. 1 as a percentage is 100%, so 100% of our data reads and writes are requiring two physical reads or writes.
If you are in the exchange world everything is done in 8k reads and writes. So in this case 8/64 = 0.125 or 12.5% of the reads and writes are requiring two physical reads or writes.
Now for SQL Server just because we are doubling the number of operations doesn’t mean that by fixing this you will double your disk speed. What it means is that if your disks are running at 100% utilization you can probably reduce your disk load by 50%. But if your disk utilization is 30% your disk activity won’t be any faster as your disks are not running at capacity. Will you see a performance improvement, yes. Will it be as high as if your disk was at 100%, no. Should you still fix the alignment problem? Yes.
To fix the problem isn’t easy. You have to remove all the data from the disk, and delete the partition, then recreate the partition using the DISKPAR.EXE (Windows 2000) or DISKPART.EXE (Windows 2003/2008) with the ALIGN=64 setting. To remove the data from the disk you will either need to migrate to a new disk within the server, or backup the database, fix the alignment then restore the database.