My Preferences for SSIS Design

Published On: 2019-08-08By:

Lately, I have been using SSIS execution frameworks and Biml created by other people to populate data marts and data warehouses. It has taught me a few things and helped me clarify what I like and dislike compared to my usual framework. I’ve got the beginning of my preferences list started below. There are probably situations where I would want to deviate from my preferences, but I think they make a good starting point.

Populating Data

  • For self-service BI environments, a date dimension that doesn’t go out much further than the greatest date in your data. This can be a view or stored procedure that limits and updates dates rather than a static date dimension that goes out until the end of time.
  • Unknown values are included in normal dimension loads, not in separate scripts that must be run on deployment. This way, if an unknown value is ever left out or deleted, it will be added in the next data load rather than requiring a special execution of a script.
  • Every table should have InsertDateTime and UpdateDateTime columns. The UpdateDateTime column should be populated with the same value as the InsertDateTime column upon creation of the row, rather than being left null.
  • Whatever you use to create tables, include primary keys, foreign keys, and indexes with your table definitions. Provide explicit constraint names to simplify database comparisons. You can disable your foreign keys, but they need to be there to provide that metadata.
  • Separate your final dimensional/reporting tables from audit tables and staging tables. This can be done with separate schemas or even separate databases.

Data Integration Process

  • There should be consistent error handling in each layer (staging, dims, facts, etc.). If you write errors to another location (flat file, database table), have a process that notifies the right people that errors occurred. The process of consuming corrected data must be built, tested, and integrated into the existing process.
  • Make your error handling process reflect what end users need to see when an error occurs. Does it make sense to have a partial load when there is an issue? Or should it be all or nothing?
  • Have smart master packages that determine which packages to run. Don’t check whether the package should run inside of the package itself – do that in the master package.
  • Master packages should execute child packages in parallel as much as possible rather than defaulting to sequential execution.
  • Have an audit log with one row per package. Include the SSIS ServerExecutionID in the audit log – not the package -specific ID but the execution ID for the entire run. If there are incremental loads, the where clause used to filter the load should be captured in the audit table. Include row counts as well as package start and stop time in your audit log.
  • Add an AuditLogID column on your dimension, fact, and staging tables so you can trace each row back to the process that populated it.
  • For dims and facts, perform change detection/deduplication of records, usually through hash values and either SSIS lookups or SQL queries with WHERE NOT EXISTS.
  • Avoid T-SQL MERGE statements. Write individual insert/update/delete statements. This avoid any bugs in MERGE and makes your SQL easier to understand and troubleshoot.
  • Use consistent naming of tasks, source, destinations, packages, connection managers, etc. Connection managers pointing to databases should have names that refer to the database rather than the server.
  • If you are downloading files, move the files to an archive folder once files are processed. You can have rules in place if you have retention limits. But you probably need to keep files from at least the last load for audit and troubleshooting purposes. This could change if you are importing very sensitive data.
  • Even if you need to copy all columns from a table, write a select statement for database sources that explicitly names fields rather than using SELECT *. or just selecting the table or view.
  • SSIS lookups should use an explicit query rather than referencing an entire table.
  • Implement restartability at the package level for most packages (you should have single-purpose packages executed by a master package). Checkpoints are ineffective within a package. If you build your audit log table correctly, you can get the list of packages that have not run in the last X minutes/hours and feed that to your master package.
  • Send email from your scheduling tool rather than within an SSIS package.
  • Track data lineage in your tables. This can be as simple as having a table that lists all of your data sources with an ID column and including that ID value in each row of your staging, fact, and dimension tables.
  • Dims and facts are not truncated. Data should be inserted and updated (and deleted, if necessary).
  • Connection strings used in multiple packages should be project-level connection strings.

Biml Specifics

  • Understand whether you need a flexible Biml Framework or just an accelerator for a current project. If you need flexibility, don’t hardcode connection strings and other things that change when you add/change sources and destinations. If you just need to accelerate development of a simple data mart, total flexibility may be overkill and actually cause more work.
  • Have a single place where you add synthetic metadata, as much as possible. BimlScript gets messy and difficult to understand when you have some extended properties that are read in, some annotations added directly, and some variables defined in your code. This is why I like synthetic metadata stored in a database. Also, extended properties don’t exist in Azure SQL Data Warehouse, so if you need your framework to work there you can’t go that route.
  • Don’t repeat your code in multiple files. If you have some logic that gets reused, move it to a separate file and reference it from other files.

What Do You Think?

What’s on your SSIS preferences list? Do you disagree with one of my preferences and want to share your knowledge? Let’s chat in the comments.


Contact the Author | Contact DCAC

Video

Globally Recognized Expertise

As Microsoft MVP’s and Partners as well as VMware experts, we are summoned by companies all over the world to fine-tune and problem-solve the most difficult architecture, infrastructure and network challenges.

And sometimes we’re asked to share what we did, at events like Microsoft’s PASS Summit 2015.

Awards & Certifications

Microsoft Partner    Microsoft MVP    Microsoft Certified Master    VMWare Partner    VMWare vExpert
   Best Full-Service Cloud Technology Consulting Company    Insights Sccess Award    Technology Headlines Award    Golden Bridge Gold Award    CIO Review Top 20 Azure Solutions Providers
Share via
Copy link